Journal of Surgery
Research Article
Diaphragmatic Hernia after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
Mungo B, Gleisner A, Rincon-Cruz L, Thornton L, Friedman C, Mitchell J, Weyant M, Meguid RA, Scott C, Pratap A, and McCarter M*
Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, USA
*Address for Correspondence: McCarter M, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Ave., C302, Aurora, CO 80045, 720-724-2738 (O),
303-724-2733 (F), E-mail: martin.mccarter@cuanschutz.edu
Submission: March-31-2020;
Accepted: May-04-2020;
Published: May-06-2020
Copyright: © 2020 Mungo B. This is an open access article distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Background: Diaphragmatic Hernias (DH) are a known, yet poorly
studied, post-surgical complication of esophagectomy. The aim of
this study was to analyze the Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE)
experience at a single high-volume academic institution, in order to
identify risk factors associated with DH.
Methods: We reviewed data from MIEs performed at our institution
(July 2013 - January 2018). Patients who developed a DH at any time
post operatively were compared to those who did not. We compared
pre-, intra- and postoperative clinical variables of interest in the two
groups using Fisher’s exact test for all categorical variables and Mann-
Whitney test for continuous variables.
Results: 103 patients underwent MIE during the study period; eight
developed DH in a time frame ranging from one week to two years post
operatively. All identified DH involved >1 intraabdominal organs other
than the stomach; seven patients required reoperation. DH patients
appeared to have lower Body Mass Index (BMI) and lower incidence
of reported gastroesophageal reflux disease. Furthermore, the DH
population tended to have an overall more advanced cancer stage
(p=0.028) and a higher incidence of occult microscopically positive
margins in the resected specimen (p=0.027). There were no statistically
significant differences in intraoperative variables between the two
groups, nor where there differences in incidence of postoperative
complications other than DH.
Conclusion: DH occurred in approximately 8% of patients
undergoing MIE. Lower BMI and more advance cancer stage appear
to be significantly associated with DH, perhaps pointing towards more
extensive dissection as a potential risk factor.