Journal of Cancer Sciences
Review Article
The Consequences of the 1986 Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster are Still Felt Today
Jargin SV
Department of Pathology, People’s Friendship University of Russia, Russian
Federation
*Address for Correspondence: Jargin SV, Department of Pathology, People’s Friendship University of
Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation. E-mail Id: sjargin@mail.ru
Submission: 22 January, 2025
Accepted: 19 February, 2025
Published: 21 February, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Jargin SV. This is an open access article distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original work is properly cited.
Keywords:Ionizing radiation; Radiation safety; Hormesis; Thyroid
cancer
Abstract
This review summarizes publications on medical and biological
effects of low-dose radiation. Potential bias in epidemiological
research is analyzed. Consequences of Chernobyl accident and
radiocontamination in the Urals are discussed in some detail. Thyroid
cancer was rarely diagnosed in children and adolescents in the
former Soviet Union prior to the accident. The mass screening after the
accident found not only small tumors but also advanced neglected
cancers misinterpreted as aggressive radiogenic malignancies. The
latter gave rise to the concept that cancer in exposed individuals
is more aggressive than in the general population, which caused
overtreatment. Children at schools and preschools were easily
available for screening; mass examinations were performed under
conditions of high expectancy of thyroid cancer, which resulted in
overdiagnosis. Some patients from non-contaminated areas were
registered as Chernobyl victims. After the accident, numerous poorly
substantiated publications appeared, whereas spontaneous diseases
in clean-up workers or residents of contaminated areas were a priori
regarded to be radiogenic. The accident has been exploited to
strangle the worldwide development of atomic energy for boosting
of fossil fuel prices. Later on, consequences of contaminations in the
Urals have been overestimated as well. Radiation safety standards
are exceedingly restrictive and should be revised to become more
realistic and workable. Elevation of the limits must be accompanied
by measures guaranteeing their observance. Strictly observed realistic
safety norms will bring more benefit for the public health than excessive
restrictions that would be neglected in countries with prevailing
disrespect for laws and regulations. Of note, negligence and disregard
of written instructions was among the causes of the Chernobyl
catastrophe. In conclusion, consequences of the Chernobyl accident
are still felt: some countries continue dismantling nuclear power plants,
thus strengthening their economic dependence on Russia.