Journal of Clinical and Investigative Dermatology

Research Article

Trial of Ultraviolet Clear PermaSlip Mounting Medium and Ultraviolet Light as New Clearing Agent in Mohs Micrographic Surgery Tissue Processing

Kichena S1, Aldrete J2 and Tolkachjov SN3-6*

1Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX
2Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas
3Department of Dermatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
4Epiphany Dermatology, Dallas, Texas
5Department of Dermatology, University of Texas at Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
6Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Dallas, Texas
*Address for Correspondence: Stanislav N. Tolkachjov, Department of Dermatology, University of Texas at Southwestern, Dallas, Texas USA. E mail Id: Stan. tolkachjov@gmail.com
Submission:22 July, 2024 Accepted:15 August, 2024 Published:20 August, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Kichena S, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attri-bution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords:Clearing Agent; UV Mounting Medium; UV Light; Xylene; Xylene Substitute

Abstract

Xylene and xylene substitutes are commonly used as clearing agents when processing tissue samples during Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). However, there are several concerns with these solvents. Xylene is expensive, malodorous, and can be toxic depending on exposure levels. While xylene substitutes are less toxic, some of these are more expensive than xylene itself or do not biodegrade easily and require specific waste disposal. Here, we discuss an alternative using Ultraviolet (UV) Clear PermaSlip Mounting Medium and a UV light. This technique is advantageous in that it is non-toxic, has no odor, and does not have the significant costs of purchase and disposal that xylene and xylene substitute typically have. However, we found this technique can add up to 2 minutes to the process, and more importantly, may reduce the quality of the slide. Upon slide review with this method, we found more intracellular lacunae artifact with keratinocytes in the epidermis compared to the same tissue on consecutive cuts where traditional xylene substitute was used. Future studies could look at ways to minimize lacunae with this method. Ultimately, we must weigh the advantages and disadvantages of using a UV mounting medium and UV light and utilize our different options to provide the best quality patient care